TweetPsych uses two linguistic analysis algorithms (RID and LIWC) to build a psychological profile of a person based on the content of their tweets. The service analyzes your last 1000 tweets and works best on users who have posted more than 1000 updates. It also works best on accounts that are operated by a single user and use Twitter in a conversational manner, rather than simply a content distribution platform. For more information read the blog post or follow the creator Dan Zarrella

New: check out the TweetPsych Site Profiler

Click here to tweet about TweetPsych

The features displayed below are those for which you score higher than the average. The score indicates how much more often you tweeted something that matched each feature than the baseline.

Cognitive Content

Feature	Description	Score
Cognitive processes	You often talk about various cognitive processes like learning, thinking, knowing, etc.	98.44
Past tense	You tend to talk about the past.	47.33
Occupation & work	You talk a lot about jobs and your work.	33.18
Insight		32.03
Time		28.35
Positive Feelings	You often discuss positive sensations and feelings.	16.12
Positive emotions	You express plenty of positive emotions.	13.72
Motion		12.63
Agreement	You're an agreeable person.	11.58
Similes		7.26
Inhib		7.1
Sleep		5.31

Primordial, Conceptual and Emotional Content

Feature	Description	Score
Abstract thought		156.27
Temporal References		60.83
Social behavior		44.79
Anxiety		13.96
Moral imperative		11.39
Positive affect		10.02
Restraint		6.62

The users below are those users who are the closest match to your TweetPsych profile. As we profile more users this will get more accurate.

Some people that think like you:		Tweets	Followers
	artrox	4812	1335	Tweet @artrox
	ClintonSkakun	6756	1024	Tweet @ClintonSkakun
	Remi_Woler	439	135	Tweet @Remi_Woler
	ImNickArmstrong	7810	1713	Tweet @ImNickArmstrong
	marksherrick	3837	553	Tweet @marksherrick

Created by Dan Zarrella © 2009 (160,693 accounts analyzed)



The results presented here are for entertainment purposes only and the terms used are psychological and may not equate with their normal, english language usage